Loading page
Every stage below has a defined pass condition. A record that fails one does not quietly continue to the next, which is the only reason the number at the end means anything.
Nothing here is unusual. What matters is that each stage has a defined pass condition and that a record which fails one does not quietly continue to the next.
Campaigns run across search, paid social, native, email, linkout and owned media, built around the intent signals that actually predict a conversation in that vertical.
Passes when:A consumer has taken a deliberate action against a disclosed offer.
Before anything routes, the caller is asked the questions that determine whether the conversation can go anywhere, eligibility, geography, decision authority, timing.
Passes when:Every hard qualifying criterion for the campaign has been answered.
The record is matched against your agreed filters and checked against recent network activity so the same consumer is not sold twice or resold as new.
Passes when:Inside your filters, and not a duplicate of a recent record.
The call is routed to you, or an agent introduces the caller to your team on a live transfer. Hours, caps and overflow behaviour are all set by you.
Passes when:Delivered inside your schedule and under your daily cap.
Call-level records with source attribution, duration and outcome where you share it back, available in close to real time rather than in a monthly summary.
Passes when:Every delivered call is attributable to a specific source.
Performance is reviewed by source. Budget moves towards what is converting and sources below the agreed standard are paused the same day they are identified.
Passes when:Underperforming sources are removed, not averaged away.
A meaningful share of our volume comes from consumer properties we operate ourselves. That matters less for the reach than for the control, when we own the page, we own the disclosure, the qualifying questions and the experience the consumer actually had before they called you.
Written, designed and tested by us. No borrowed landing page we have never seen, and no claim we would not put our own name against.
Named, legible, and served before contact. We keep the exact version the consumer saw, not a description of it.
Qualifying fields set against what your team actually needs to open a conversation, rather than the shortest form that maximises submissions.
What the consumer is told will happen next matches what happens next. Most complaints in this industry trace back to that one gap.
Alongside that, we work with a vetted set of external partners for reach and variety. They are held to the properties' own standard: same disclosures, same consent capture, same review before anything runs.
We use automated scoring and verification to catch what does not need a person's judgement, bad numbers, duplicate submissions, mismatched geography, patterns that do not look like a real consumer. It is unglamorous work and it is where most of the wasted spend in this industry goes.
Numbers and addresses are checked for validity, line type and reachability before an enquiry is accepted. Disconnected and non-conforming records are rejected at source.
Submissions are matched against recent activity across the network so the same consumer is not sold twice, or sold again a week later as a new enquiry.
Behavioural signals from the session, how the consumer arrived, how they moved through the page, what they completed, are scored to separate genuine intent from incidental form fills.
Landing pages, form length and creative are tested continuously rather than set once, so spend concentrates on the variants that convert and acquisition cost falls over the life of the campaign.
The record is tested against the buyer's agreed filters. Anything outside geography, product, eligibility or hours is not routed and is not billed.
Lower acquisition cost in this channel is rarely a cheaper media buy. It comes from not paying to process records that were never going to convert, and from continuous testing of landing pages and creative so budget concentrates on the variants that earn it. Both are mechanical, both compound, and neither is visible in a headline CPL.
None of this replaces human review. It removes the volume that would otherwise consume it, so the manual pass can be spent on the calls where judgement actually changes the outcome.
Automated checks handle scale. Quality over time comes from reviewing what the automation let through, at source level, often enough to act while it still matters.
A rolling sample of calls and enquiries is reviewed by a person against the buyer's qualifying criteria. It is the only reliable way to catch a source that is technically compliant and practically useless.
Every source is tracked separately rather than rolled into a campaign average. A blended number hides exactly the thing you need to see, which is which specific source stopped working.
Where a buyer shares downstream outcomes, we track to cost per acquisition rather than cost per call. Optimising to the wrong end of the funnel is the most common way a campaign looks fine and loses money.
A source that falls below the agreed standard is paused the day it is identified, not at the end of the billing cycle. We would rather lose the volume than spend a month explaining it.
Every vertical we run in is regulated, and the exposure attaches to whoever ends up on the phone with the consumer. So the standard we work to is not what we can get away with, it is what we could produce if somebody asked.
Consumers are shown a named disclosure before any contact. The disclosure text as served, the page, and the timestamp are retained with the record and produced on request.
Medicare campaigns carry additional obligations around permission to contact, scripting, call recording and retention. Those apply on top of everything else and we onboard more carefully in that vertical.
Debt relief, insurance and legal advertising each have their own constraints on claims. Creative is reviewed against them before it runs, and buyers can review it too.
Publishers are held to the same standard as our own properties. We review the full path a consumer took, not only the form they completed, and remove sources that drift.
Consent records and, where required, call recordings are retained for agreed periods and are retrievable against a specific phone number without a development request.
A documented process for raising and reviewing calls that should not have been billed. A partner who cannot dispute has no way of holding us to the standard we agreed.
This describes how we operate. It is not legal advice, and it does not replace your own compliance review.
Tell us which side you are on and what you are trying to grow. We will come back with a scoped test campaign, the filters we would apply, and what we would need from you to run it properly.
Start on a capped test campaign. If the calls do not meet the standard we agreed, you do not pay for them.
Or call +1 (866) 555-0142 during Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM ET